Monday, 30 January 2012

The Fry Chronicles, by Stephen Fry

It’s been quite a few years now since Stephen Fry’s first volume of autobiography, the excellently-titled Moab is my Washpot - though apparently in light of the fact nobody got it, this new release has a simpler name. It was released to great fanfare about being the first book to be released in so many ways – in bookshops, as ebook download, as an iOS app etc – and shot to the top of the non-fiction charts. And I was well-pleased, because Stephen Fry is amongst my favourite public figures, being educated, eloquent, and also very funny, a non-threatening example of what much of modern England seems to have grown to fear and resent, yet also remains venerated by thousands who are perhaps less vocal about it. I thought him superb in Blackadder and Jeeves and Wooster, better in Wilde and read most of his novels. I love QI despite occasionally being annoyed by it, and his is one of only three Twitter accounts I follow. I like that he represents the old world but is so tech-savvy. I like that he is vulnerable and happy to talk about his flaws and that he is also very much an aspirational figure, and have read most of his novels, which while really no classics were well-written and highly memorable.

So though I was far from a day-one reader, I was very interested in this release once I was reminded it existed, and even put other books on hold for it, which (Anna Karenina – which I have read on and off for years now – aside) I rarely do. I had been very eager for this book after finding Moab is my Washpot so compelling yet stopping short of the most interesting parts of Fry’s life. Maybe it is because I had been so eager that I was so disappointed.

I wanted to read about Fry’s realisation that he was bipolar and his infamous disappearance. I wanted to hear about how his first love made him feel and the fear and the desire of beginning a first serious relationship. I wanted to know how his public school sexual experiences affected him later. I wanted to know about his creative process and his struggles to write books. I wanted him to talk about why almost all his books have pretty boys in their early teens in pseudo-innocent sexual situations. I wanted to hear about the rebellious side of his life at Cambridge. Instead…where the first book seemed to have Fry bear his soul about his difficult adolescence, this one seemed very much to be keeping up a screen, despite the times he consciously says that he is revealing more than, perhaps, he would like to. Oh, and it said ‘autres maeurs’ instead of ‘autres moeurs’.

It’s a short book, and there are some very pleasant anecdotes about Emma Thompson, about Alan Bennett and about Douglas Adams, all drawn in the shorthand needed for such public figures. There’s some interesting little paragraphs about Blackadder and I derived some personal satisfaction from seeing how similar Fry’s attitude to his Cambridge education was to my own, except when it came to writing exams: he apparently developed a winning essay that he could bend to answer any question, largely based on an Anne Barton essay (my own wonderful old skeleton of a supervisor as an undergrad).

But by and large, this book was dull and totally lacking in insight. Some anecdotes had been told on QI. Others were covered in documentaries about Blackadder. All were the sort of thing suitable for those platforms – light, entertaining and at arm’s length from the actual man and his actual beliefs. His endless hand-wringing and emphasising the fact that he knows he’s very lucky and doesn’t want to come over as a prick but inevitably will gets very tiresome, too.

Perhaps it’s time to expect the safe and sanitary from Fry. But I wanted so much more than a book full of the padding of funny little stories and the repetition of the fact he really just got very lucky writing a play for Edinburgh, being in Footlights at the right time and getting an agent out of it, with everything else just tumbling out of that. This felt like an inflated encyclopaedia entry written by the subject. I wanted to know not just what happened, but how it felt.

Well, there’s still another volume to come – or even, perhaps, two. I will still read them, but my keenness has faded.

2 comments:

  1. I started following Stephen Fry's career about two years after he started Qi and became more of a common household name than he ever was. In a way, i never fully immersed myself in him, never actively watched everything he was in, or hunted down anonymous clips of interviews, but I still admired his life and his struggles. It almost seems to me as if he's diluted himself recently, as he has become more popular. His disappearance, I believe, was triggered by bad reviews of a play he was in, and in a way, he remains as self-conscience as he was back in the 90s. He quit twitter for a time when he was badly critisised for implying something that was completely misconstrued. I'm a fan of his love of Oscar Wilde's description of "the love that dare not speak it's name", and I would've loved to hear more about his ideas on the relationship between a wise older gentleman, and a youthful man, but in a way, I feel perhaps he avoids talking about the more risque topics to guard himself from this critisism now that he's exposed to the public eye far more often.

    When Qi first started, he was a remnant of the past, and honestly, having turned ten just after the final series of Blackadder aired, I had barely even heard of him until I was shown Fry and Laurie by one of those "best sketches" clipshows. My slightly younger friends certainly know very little about his previous works, and were completely blank when I asked them if they'd see A Bit of Fry and Laurie. Now though, he's a regular installment on the BBC and has become, yet again, a much talked about man. The press will always turn, even if it is on someone as endearing as this well educated, carefully worded, brilliant man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment! Fry has been in my life since early childhood, when we would often watch Blackadder and he would pop up on the likes of Whose Line is it Anyway?

      His disappearance has been covered well enough, it's true, especially when he discusses his bipolar disorder, but I certainly wanted more insight. That's for the next volume, though.

      It's a bit pedantic, but I feel that I should point out that 'the love that dare not speak its name' was not a description Wilde's (though of course he spoke on the subject in his trial) but of that odious pile of dirt Lord Alfred Douglas, then known as Bosie.

      I realise he's more of a public figure now than ever, but this is after all a man who still has books in the bookshop that in fiction graphically depict a 14-year-old boy having sex with a horse or have the main schoolboy character trick another boy into having sex with him while pretending he was asleep all the way through (somehow), and in non-fiction has him committing fraud and being rather confused when he got buggered at school. His publication history is already steeped in the controversial, so I don't see why he suddenly has to play it so safe and end up boring.

      Delete